homemartial artsinterviewsmystery tababoutcontact

Recent Comments

  • Branden: Ironic. I believe our “coin jars” (budo training) are much bigger… and have far less in...
  • karrie: Great post! My grandfather had a jar just like yours (minus the hole…)and filled it with pennies. Yes,...
  • John: I think William Chow of kenpo fame claimed to be a 15th dan. Self-promoted, no less. Interestingly he lived in...
  • Rick Matz: Very good post. Keep them coming.
  • Matthew: haha, thanks Greg, I award you full points for that one. Although I would like to say that that is one thing...

Archives

TopBlogLists.com - Blog Search Ikigai | Blogging the Martial Way - Blogged
Blog directory
Join My Community at MyBloglog!

Do You Believe in Chi?

September 29, 2008 | Author: Matthew | Filed under: Martial Arts, Opinion, Philisophical, mindset

Special thanks goes out to Lizzie for inspiring this post.  In the comments section of my last entry, George Alexander Interview Part 2, Lizzie asked a very simple question:  Do you believe in Chi?

Interesting.  Both the question and the wording.

Most people have heard of Chi, even if they have only the faintest familiarity with the martial arts.  Shows like Kung Fu, combined with slews of low budget martial arts movies, have made Chi a household concept.  Supposedly, Chi is that magical power that causes Shaolin monks to levitate and smash concrete with their bare hands.

Kung Fu with David Carradine
Kung Fu with David Carradine

Of course, the question wasn’t “what is Chi?”, but “do you believe in Chi?”  And I would like to answer that directly - I don’t think Chi is something that needs to be ‘believed in.’  Chi being “mystical” is a bit of a western manifestation of something they was initially misunderstood.  This mysticism has persisted because it translates well into movies is perpetuated by charlatans who know they can make a quick buck.

Chi (or ki) is mostly just an eastern explanation of the natural energy we all have.  A more modern term is biokinetics.  Your ability to apply force on an object or to move your body is all powered by Chi.  Further, Chi can be focused.  When you contract your muscles and well up your energy for a sharp punch, you’ve essentially focused your Chi.

We all know energy exists.  If you watch a fire, you see heat and light energy being emitted from the chemical reaction taking place.  When we eat a good meal, we feel revitalized because the body is replenished with the natural chemicals it needs to create the energy that fuels our body.  It’s not mystical…it’s just life!

Therefore, you can say I do believe in Chi…in the traditional sense.

This leads us to the bigger question, the Chi elephant in the room - do I believe in the miraculous abilities espoused by “Chi Masters.”

No.  For the most part.  95% of Chi manipulation I have encountered involves gaijin pretending like they are David Carradine.  It occurs often.  There is nothing mystical about striking someone in the temple and watching them get knocked out.  There is also nothing mystical about striking two vital points that cause an electrical disruption to the brain.  There is ALSO nothing mystical about temporarily cutting off bloodflow to the brain.

These are just effective techniques.  You can use a light ‘Chi’ touch because a compliant partner in a calm state is very receptive to disruptions in his/her body.  In other words, kyusho isn’t mystical.  It just takes tons and tons of practice.

Chi That I Don’t Buy Into

As I mentioned earlier, some people use the myth of Chi for their own personal gain.  Somewhere along the line, “the no touch knockout” started to make an appearance.  This baffles me.  In all the old texts I have read (think bubishi), there is never a mention of the no touch knockout.  If this is such an astounding technique, wouldn’t the Okinawans have at least hinted at it in their most important martial text?

Maybe it was too secret…who knows.  But none of the senior instructors I have ever trained with have claimed to know this technique, nor have they ever seen it done by the Okinawan masters of the previous generation.  Nor are there any tales handed down through the generations of Okinawans about this technique being used.  Yet…here it is:

I’m not here to make any judgments about the character of this instructor or the students; I’m merely suggesting that this technique works on the students for reason other than the myth of Chi.

Consider this: hypnosis is a voluntary state of mind.  People willingly interact with a hypnotist in order to cure small ailments or unveil buried parts of their psyche.  The mind is a powerful tool, and when combined with will, can be affected dramatically.

If you were told over and over again that you’re feeling Chi energy from your instructor, and all your peers are telling you you feel it, and you really want to feel it…guess what…you’re going to feel it.

Why is this dangerous?  Because it turns into this:

This was just a sporting event.  Those Chi students could be in for a lot worse in real life.

Chi That I Won’t Discount Right Away

I’m a skeptic, it’s true.  But that certainly doesn’t mean I’m closed minded.  We are far from unlocking all the little mysteries that make up the human mind.  The first kind of Chi that I do not discount is physical conditioning plus trained willpower.

Shaolin Monks do, in fact, break cement slabs.  They lay on beds of nails and endure spear thrusts without any puncture wounds.  These feats are truly impressive, but they come from years of rigorous physical training and learning how to control the energy in the body.  Think of it this way: if you are just standing around and someone sucker punches you in the gut, you are bound to go down in a heap.  But if you tense all your abdominal strength and focus your entire being into absorbing that blow…you’ll be ok (assuming you’ve done adequate physical training).  These kinds of dynamic feats are impressive and serve to show the adaptability of the human body.

The other kind of Chi I don’t readily discount is healing.  Acupuncture, Qigong, Tai Chi, and others all claim to have healing properties.  These arts use the Chinese meridian theory of Chi flow in the body.  Much like Kyusho can be used to disrupt electrical/blood flow, so can healing be used to promote it.

These healing arts get very complex, utilizing different times of day, meridians, vital points, and more.  How much is myth and superstition vs how much promotes health I couldn’t possibly say.  All I’m saying is that this is Chi that seems feasible to me.

I’d like to leave you with something that blurs the lines.  At first when you watch this, you’ll be inclined to disbelieve.  I know I was.  But by the end I was left scratching my chin.  How much of this is Chi fluff…how much is real?  I’ll let you decide.

***

Special thanks to everyone for reading and commenting.  Feel free to ask questions the way Lizzie did!

Share This (Good Karma Guaranteed):
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • NewsVine
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
xygoxen

21 people have left comments

Wow, that was a pretty remarkable video. Probably the best, creepiest chi demo I’ve seen.

Patrick Parker wrote on September 29, 2008 - 11:33 pm | Visit Link

Like you I’m a bit of a skeptic, but I try to be open minded to these possibilities. Martial artists - the real ones - can perform amazing feats at times. Who wouldn’t want to possess these quasi-magical powers?

Chi/ki, prana, etc., if it really exists, will remain relegated to fiction with all the snake-oil salesman out there. Jack Hogan, another ryukyu kempoist like George Dillman, does this trick where he KOs his students by just looking at them. Yeah, okay.

John wrote on September 30, 2008 - 12:31 am | Visit Link

Thanks for answering my question. Ya, I don’t believe that old dude in the last part of your post. It does seem that his powers are electrical though. I believe in chi and meridians. I know that through certain therapies, one can be healed through chi.

Lizzie wrote on September 30, 2008 - 7:10 am | Visit Link

Very good post, echoing many thoughts I have had.

Not trying to plug my own pitiful blogging, but in section three of this post, I provide quite a bit of relevant thinking and quotes on the subject. It’s one of the most heavily-hit posts I’ve written (as I predict this one will be for you), and some of your readers might find it interesting.

Savage Baptist wrote on September 30, 2008 - 8:21 am | Visit Link

[...] Continue here: Do You Believe in Chi? [...]

Do You Believe in Chi? | Mind Control Hypnosis wrote on September 30, 2008 - 8:29 am | Visit Link

I found that video about Jack Hogan doing the ‘look knockout’ here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HgzfikdJL0. Thanks for the heads up John!

Matthew wrote on September 30, 2008 - 10:36 am | Visit Link

Our species is always very quick to discard anything that isn’t either a general human ability, or has been “scientifically disproved”. I think the fact that we use all 10% of our brains should have use looking deeper for answers, not discrediting people who seem to poses the ability to do so. Some interesting links from some credited sources to think about:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3236118.stm
http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2002/04.18/09-tummo.html

Nice article Matt San!

Branden wrote on September 30, 2008 - 11:42 am | Visit Link

So as not to be confused with a crazy man, I’m not saying that we could unlock the secrets of flying, or moving object, or even projecting “chi”. But more so, after reading this article, wanted to say that some things, are unexplainable, and will remain so. I am not..THAT..crazy.

Branden wrote on September 30, 2008 - 1:57 pm | Visit Link

Great articles Brandensan! I enjoyed reading them. It is remarkable what some people are capable of, especially when it isn’t embellished with all kinds of nonsense.

I guess I won’t report you to the mental health authorities…just yet.

Matthew wrote on September 30, 2008 - 3:15 pm | Visit Link

I read a WHOLE BOOK on Chi as applied to running, talk your ear off about it, and I get no credit for getting those wheels turning? Man, I feel ripped off! haha

Seriously, though, I truly believe in chi/a life energy/the Force, whatever you want to call it. It’s a weird paradox of release and strength that leads to some pretty unbelievable feats. The only thing standing in the way of a fully unleashed chi is our egos, telling ourselves, “oh no, you can’t do that,” or “my body just isn’t as strong as theirs.” So, when we are sleeping and we act out (i hear this happens to some people sometimes…), we are incredibly strong, much more so than we are in our waking lives. Just another example of the subconscious acting out…

Just my input….you’re going to ban me from leaving comments, aren’t you? haha

Foxy Citrus wrote on September 30, 2008 - 7:36 pm | Visit Link

Actually I’ve been running into Chi all over the place lately. Your chi running was one of those. Lizzie’s direct question is what prompted me to write an entry because when I went to respond in the comments I found I couldn’t write anything less than a few paragraphs.

You aren’t banned - it would take a lot more than that. Although I can’t stop people from looking at you funny if they want to ;)

Matthew wrote on September 30, 2008 - 7:51 pm | Visit Link

On the subject of no-touch knockouts, this video may interest you:

http://www.martialdevelopment.com/blog/can-qigong-soothe-these-savage-beasts/

Chris | Martial Development wrote on October 2, 2008 - 12:54 am | Visit Link

Thanks Chris! I love weird Japanese shows. The qigong aside, it’s just fun to watch the craziness.

As for the qigong itself, I’m not one to completely discount or support it - I find this video interesting and worthy of consideration. However, I will say - I don’t see anything here that would prove no touch knockout techniques.

Is the master soothing these animals with his calm mind and spirit? Potentially. He’s not knocking anything out though.

Furthermore, we don’t really know the time of day or condition of these animals. We must consider the possibility that the demo was arranged at a very well established sleep time in the zoo (especially for the deer).

Ultimately, if it doesn’t work on a resistant opponent, be it Bob Sapp or Glass Joe from Mike Tyson’s Punch Out, it’s not viable in combat sense.

Matthew wrote on October 2, 2008 - 10:31 am | Visit Link

I think there has been alot of interesting stuff suppressed heavily in North American science. It has been hammered into our minds that all we have is our 5 senses. I agree with Branden: the fact that we use merely 10% of our brain should keep us looking a little harder for answers.

uboslav wrote on October 15, 2008 - 8:08 pm | Visit Link

My traditional martial arts background is Korean so I will call it Ki here.

I had the absolute honour of training with the founder of Hapkido, Ji, Han Jae a few years ago. He said Ki was basically adrenaline. However, the trick is to generate it purely by using the mind. Anyone can get an adrenaline dump by jumping out of a plane but to mentally generate adrenaline and control its flow is what true harnessing and control of Ki is.

Think of a mother lifting a fallen car off her baby. Think of the pain suppression under the influence of adrenaline, the super athletic performance, increased perception, any flu or illness being felt by someone hit by a sudden surge of adrenaline for whatever emergency situation they are placed in is gone momentarily…

He said Ki is Adrenaline. Its just that we have to learn to control it by the mind. That is it.

Just some thoughts i thought i would share. Interesting post and comments.

Adam @ Low Tech Combat wrote on October 18, 2008 - 9:05 pm | Visit Link
Internal Arts Teaching wrote on October 22, 2008 - 9:58 am | Visit Link

I do and teach Tai Chi and the biggest rip off and degeneration of my art leans on liars. Chi-liars…they pretend to push people 30-feet with their chi! Bah. That stunt relies on ridiculous mind-training of fragile-believe-anything students. Worse though: like the second video, those teacher train people to die (or at least get their butts kicked).

The burning paper trick is a well-known chemical thing too!

I don’t believe in chi, because I can experience it! But experiencing the subtle whir and extraordinary perceptions doesn’t turn reality into fantasy. It does not burst things into flame.

So I don’t talk about it in my school (much). I prefer, instead, to test reality and apply relaxation to real applications. We can discover chi (really, effects of chi) without believing in it.

Steven Smith wrote on October 28, 2008 - 4:10 pm | Visit Link

I hear ya Steve.

Could you talk a little bit more about the burning paper trick? I don’t know anything about it and was at a loss to explain it.

Matthew wrote on October 28, 2008 - 4:19 pm | Visit Link

I read extensive talk about it on someone’s blog (maybe Chris’ at Martial Development?) but I don’t remember whose. Perhaps well-known is exaggerating, but it seemed well-known in whatever discussion I read.

I don’t keep good track of it, because, well, it’s all quite ridiculous. Like great magicians, they capture attention and awe, and we end up going WOW! That part’s okay. But David Blaine does not sell self-defense during or after his shows.

That’s where I think Qi-fakers amp up my ire: selling their lies as miraculous self-defense. And somewhere, there’s always a senior student lurking in the shadows helping the show go on.

I could go on…but I leave with this: some students and their teachers (take Chen Man Ching for example) get so taken by their beliefs surrounding special abilities that they are willing to take a pounding (like the video you posted). And that is a shameful sham.

Steven Smith wrote on October 28, 2008 - 5:00 pm | Visit Link

I’ve actually forgotten about chi for a while now. Just let things flow and the supposed chi should come. I’ve come to understand not to focus on this mysterious chi, and go with the flow. My current teacher summarizes: “if you don’t have chi, you’d be dead”.

Shang Lee wrote on October 29, 2008 - 9:16 am | Visit Link
Shang Lee wrote on October 29, 2008 - 9:24 am | Visit Link

feel free to leave a comment

All fields marked with " * " are required.